Opera, genetically modified crops, and musical performance might seem like disparate fields, yet they share surprising connections. Consider the opera's dramatic structure, often built around conflict and resolution, mirroring the tension between proponents and opponents of genetically modified (GM) crops. The public debate surrounding GM foods – concerning issues of safety, environmental impact, and ethical considerations – echoes the passionate arguments that often erupt around opera productions. Furthermore, the aesthetic experience of opera is interwoven with technological innovation. From the elaborate stage machinery to the sophisticated sound systems, technology plays a crucial role in bringing the opera to life. This parallels the advanced technologies employed in the development and cultivation of GM crops, from genetic engineering techniques to precision agriculture. The creation of both GM crops and operatic performances involves intricate planning, extensive research, and collaborative efforts from numerous specialists. Finally, the emotional power of opera often lies in its ability to evoke strong feelings in the audience – joy, sorrow, anger, and hope. Similarly, the debate surrounding GM crops stirs intense emotions. Some see GM crops as a solution to global food security, a source of hope in the face of climate change and population growth. Others express deep anxieties about their potential negative consequences, fearing unforeseen risks to human health and the environment. The passionate engagement with both GM crops and opera reflects the human desire to grapple with complex issues that deeply affect our lives. A recent musical performance, for instance, incorporated sounds and visuals inspired by the controversy surrounding GM crops, highlighting the convergence of art and science in exploring these significant challenges. The interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated areas – opera, GM crops, and musical performance – illuminates how different aspects of human experience and technological advancement intersect and illuminate one another.
1. According to the passage, what is a key similarity between the opera and the debate surrounding genetically modified crops?
2. The passage uses the analogy of opera's technological aspects to highlight what aspect of GM crop development?
3. What is the main point of the final paragraph?
4. The author's tone throughout the passage can best be described as:
5. Which of the following is NOT explicitly mentioned in the passage as a shared characteristic between opera and the debate surrounding GM crops?