Nanotechnology, with its promise of revolutionary advancements in materials science and medicine, is rapidly transforming our world. However, this technological leap forward is not without its challenges. Concerns regarding environmental impact, ethical considerations surrounding human enhancement, and the equitable distribution of its benefits have sparked robust public discourse and citizen movements. One prominent concern centers on the potential environmental risks associated with the production and disposal of nanomaterials. Many nanoparticles exhibit unique properties that differ significantly from their bulk counterparts, leading to uncertainties about their long-term effects on ecosystems. The persistence of some nanoparticles in the environment, coupled with their potential toxicity, poses a significant threat to biodiversity and human health. Citizen groups are increasingly demanding stricter regulations and greater transparency from industries involved in nanotechnology development and application. Another critical issue revolves around resource ethics. The extraction and processing of raw materials required for nanotechnology often involve environmentally damaging practices, such as unsustainable mining and the release of hazardous chemicals. Furthermore, the concentration of nanotechnology development in wealthier nations raises concerns about equitable access to its benefits. Developing countries, which often bear the brunt of environmental damage associated with resource extraction, frequently lack the capacity to participate fully in the benefits generated by nanomaterials. Citizen movements have emerged as key players in shaping the ethical trajectory of nanotechnology. These groups leverage various strategies, including advocacy, public education, and legal challenges, to promote environmentally responsible practices and equitable distribution of nanotechnology's benefits. Their efforts often focus on influencing policy decisions, holding industries accountable, and fostering a more inclusive and sustainable approach to technological development. The interplay between technological advancement, ethical considerations, and citizen engagement highlights a crucial dilemma: how to harness the transformative potential of nanotechnology while mitigating its inherent risks and ensuring equitable access to its benefits for all members of society. The ongoing debate underscores the importance of integrating resource ethics and public participation into the process of nanotechnology innovation.
1. According to the passage, which of the following is NOT a major concern regarding nanotechnology?
2. The passage suggests that citizen movements are primarily concerned with:
3. What is the central dilemma highlighted in the concluding paragraph of the passage?
4. The term "resource ethics" in the context of the passage refers to: