ENGLISH MEBY

環境配慮設計と社会倫理:持続可能な未来のための葛藤」の英語長文問題

以下の英文を読み、設問に答えなさい。

The relentless pursuit of economic growth has often overshadowed the crucial need for environmentally conscious design and ethical considerations. While technological advancements offer solutions to environmental challenges, their implementation frequently encounters resistance from various stakeholders. This passage explores the complex interplay between environmentally sound design, social ethics, and the social movements advocating for sustainability. Consider the case of a proposed hydroelectric dam in a remote region. Such a project promises economic benefits, creating jobs and providing a reliable source of renewable energy. However, the construction necessitates the flooding of a valley, displacing indigenous communities and disrupting their traditional way of life. This exemplifies the ethical dilemma inherent in development projects: balancing the collective good of increased energy production against the potential harm to specific groups. Social movements often emerge to voice the concerns of affected populations, demanding environmental justice and equitable distribution of benefits. Moreover, the design phase itself presents significant ethical challenges. The choice of materials, manufacturing processes, and the overall lifecycle of a product all contribute to its environmental impact. For instance, a building might utilize sustainable materials like bamboo, minimizing its carbon footprint during construction. However, the transportation of these materials over long distances could negate the environmental benefits. This necessitates a holistic approach to design, encompassing considerations beyond the immediate product and taking into account the entire supply chain. The ongoing debate over fast fashion illustrates another facet of this issue. The low cost of clothing often comes at the expense of exploitative labor practices in developing countries and significant environmental pollution from textile production and waste disposal. Consumer activism, fueled by social media and increased public awareness, has led to boycotts and calls for greater corporate transparency and responsibility. This highlights the power of social movements in influencing corporate behavior and promoting more ethical and sustainable practices. Ultimately, achieving a truly sustainable future requires a fundamental shift in mindset, moving beyond a purely economic model of development and embracing a holistic approach that integrates environmental, social, and ethical considerations into every stage of the design process. The collaboration between engineers, policymakers, and social activists is essential to navigate these complex challenges and build a more equitable and sustainable world.

1. What is the central ethical dilemma presented in the passage regarding the hydroelectric dam project?

2. According to the passage, what factor can negate the environmental benefits of using sustainable materials in construction?

3. What role do social movements play in addressing the ethical challenges discussed in the passage?

4. What is the passage's concluding argument regarding achieving a sustainable future?