Go, a game of profound strategic depth, boasts a history intertwined with religious and philosophical thought in East Asia. For centuries, it has been more than mere entertainment; it has served as a meditative practice, a tool for self-cultivation, and even a reflection of cosmic order. Zen Buddhism, in particular, embraced Go, viewing its intricacies as a microcosm of life's complexities and a path to enlightenment. The game's emphasis on mindful presence and calculated moves resonated deeply with Buddhist principles of awareness and detachment. However, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has dramatically reshaped the landscape of Go. AlphaGo, a program developed by Google DeepMind, famously defeated world champion Lee Sedol in 2016, showcasing the power of machine learning to surpass human capabilities in a game once considered the exclusive domain of human intellect. This victory sparked a wave of reflection on the nature of intelligence, creativity, and human exceptionalism. Meanwhile, the development of autonomous vehicles presents a different kind of challenge, raising complex questions about safety, ethics, and regulation. The transition to self-driving cars necessitates a careful consideration of potential risks, including software glitches, unforeseen circumstances, and the ethical dilemmas posed by accident scenarios. Governments worldwide grapple with establishing appropriate regulations to ensure public safety and address liability issues while fostering technological innovation. The regulatory framework must balance the promise of safer and more efficient transportation with the need to mitigate potential hazards and safeguard human lives. The contrasting narratives of Go and autonomous vehicles highlight the multifaceted interplay between tradition and technology in contemporary society. While Go's evolution illustrates the potential for AI to transcend human abilities, the emergence of autonomous vehicles underscores the need for careful human oversight and regulation to manage the societal implications of technological progress. Both cases underscore the importance of understanding the potential benefits and drawbacks of technological innovation before its widespread adoption.
1. Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage?
2. According to the passage, how did Zen Buddhism view the game of Go?
3. What was the significance of AlphaGo's victory over Lee Sedol?
4. What is a major challenge associated with the development of autonomous vehicles, as discussed in the passage?
5. What is the primary purpose of comparing the examples of Go and autonomous vehicles in this passage?