The novel *Lakeside*, by renowned author Anya Petrova, depicts the fictional town of Priozersk nestled beside a pristine lake. Initially, the lake is portrayed as the heart of the community, vital to its livelihood and cultural identity. Fishing provides income, the lake is a source of drinking water, and its beauty draws tourists. However, the narrative charts a significant shift. The influx of tourists, initially a boon to the local economy, gradually leads to environmental degradation. As the number of visitors grows, so does the amount of waste generated. Untreated sewage contaminates the lake, leading to eutrophication – an excessive richness of nutrients causing a dense growth of plant life and the depletion of oxygen. The consequence is the death of fish and a decline in water quality. The novel contrasts the idyllic portrayal of the lake in the opening chapters with its polluted state later on, using vivid imagery to highlight the stark change. The novel doesn’t merely present the environmental damage but also explores the complex social and economic ramifications. While some residents benefit from the tourism industry, many others, particularly those whose livelihoods depend directly on the lake, suffer economic hardship. The decline in fishing affects generations of families who have relied on the lake for their sustenance. Furthermore, the author poignantly captures the emotional toll on the community; the loss of the pristine lake represents a loss of heritage and identity for the people of Priozersk. The novel concludes with a sense of uncertainty, questioning the sustainability of unchecked tourism and the value placed on economic growth over environmental preservation. Petrova’s work serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the interconnectedness between tourism, environmental sustainability, and the well-being of local communities. It raises critical questions about the responsibility of both tourists and governing bodies in managing the environmental impact of tourism and suggests that economic prosperity shouldn't come at the expense of ecological balance and cultural preservation. The novel subtly criticizes the lack of proactive environmental policies in Priozersk and implicitly advocates for a more responsible approach to tourism development.
1. According to the passage, what is the primary cause of the lake’s eutrophication in *Lakeside*?
2. What is the author’s main purpose in presenting the contrasting portrayals of the lake in *Lakeside*?
3. Which of the following best reflects the novel’s central theme?
4. What can be inferred about the author’s perspective on tourism development?