ENGLISH MEBY

カール・ポパー、再生医療、そして人間の潜在能力」の英語長文問題

以下の英文を読み、設問に答えなさい。

The philosophy of Karl Popper, particularly his concept of falsifiability, offers a compelling lens through which to examine the rapid advancements in regenerative medicine and their implications for human potential. Popper argued that scientific theories are not proven true, but rather survive attempts to disprove them. This perspective is highly relevant to the field of regenerative medicine, which is constantly evolving and characterized by both breakthroughs and setbacks. Consider the initial excitement surrounding stem cell research. Early promises of cures for various debilitating diseases were met with considerable enthusiasm. However, as research progressed, many of the initial hypotheses were challenged and, in some cases, falsified. This iterative process of proposing hypotheses, designing experiments to test them, and revising theories based on the results is precisely the Popperian approach in action. The relentless pursuit of falsification, far from hindering progress, has actually driven innovation in regenerative medicine. This constant testing and refinement also highlight the inherent uncertainties involved in unlocking human potential through regenerative therapies. The complex interplay of genetic factors, environmental influences, and individual responses to treatment makes predicting outcomes challenging. While regenerative medicine holds immense promise, it is crucial to approach its potential with cautious optimism, acknowledging the limitations of our current understanding. Popper's emphasis on conjecture and refutation further emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimentation and ethical considerations. As we develop increasingly sophisticated techniques for manipulating biological systems, we must also grapple with the ethical implications of these advancements. Will access to these therapies be equitable? What are the long-term consequences of altering the human body at a cellular level? These questions demand careful consideration and ongoing dialogue, reflecting the spirit of critical inquiry that Popper advocated. Ultimately, the exploration of human potential through regenerative medicine embodies a Popperian spirit of continuous questioning and refinement. It is a journey of discovery, driven by both the promise of breakthroughs and the necessity of confronting limitations. While the future remains unwritten, the very process of striving to understand and harness our potential is a testament to the enduring power of scientific inquiry and the ever-evolving nature of our understanding of ourselves.

1. According to the passage, what is the main relevance of Popper's philosophy of falsifiability to regenerative medicine?

2. What is the passage's attitude towards the potential of regenerative medicine?

3. How does the passage characterize the relationship between the pursuit of falsification and progress in regenerative medicine?

4. Which of the following ethical considerations is NOT explicitly mentioned in the passage?