The 2012 film \"Zero Dark Thirty\" depicts the decade-long hunt for Osama bin Laden, highlighting the complexities of intelligence gathering and the ethical dilemmas faced by those involved. The film's portrayal of the use of enhanced interrogation techniques sparked significant debate, raising questions about the effectiveness and morality of such methods in achieving national security objectives. This debate mirrors broader discussions on the causes of conflict, particularly in the context of asymmetric warfare and the challenges of combating terrorism. Meanwhile, the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) has introduced new dimensions to conflict and security. IoT devices, ranging from smart home appliances to industrial sensors, generate vast amounts of data that can be valuable for both military and civilian purposes. However, the same data can also be exploited by adversaries for surveillance, sabotage, or even cyberattacks. The interconnected nature of IoT networks creates vulnerabilities that can be easily exploited, potentially destabilizing critical infrastructure and escalating conflicts. Consider, for instance, the potential for malicious actors to remotely disable power grids or disrupt water supplies through compromised IoT devices. Such attacks could trigger social unrest and further exacerbate existing political tensions. Furthermore, the pervasiveness of surveillance technologies, enabled by IoT, raises concerns about privacy violations and the erosion of civil liberties. The ethical implications of using IoT data for security purposes require careful consideration, balancing the need for national security with the protection of fundamental rights. The challenges presented by both \"Zero Dark Thirty\" and the advancements in IoT highlight the evolving nature of conflict. Understanding the causes of conflict necessitates a nuanced approach that considers not only traditional factors but also the technological advancements and ethical dilemmas shaping the modern security landscape. The tension between security and liberty, and the potential for both technological progress and misuse, necessitates a continuous reevaluation of strategies and policies to address these complex issues.
1. According to the passage, what is a major ethical concern raised by the film \"Zero Dark Thirty\"?
2. How does the passage connect the rise of IoT to conflict?
3. What is a key tension highlighted in the passage regarding the use of IoT in security?
4. Which of the following best summarizes the passage's main argument?