The accelerating pace of globalization has profoundly reshaped the global economic landscape, leading to both unprecedented prosperity and stark inequalities. While advancements in technology and interconnected markets have lifted millions out of poverty, a widening gap persists between the wealthiest and the poorest segments of society. This disparity is particularly acute in the context of an aging global population. Japan, a nation grappling with one of the world's most rapidly aging societies, provides a compelling case study. Its advanced technological prowess has led to significant developments in the field of care robotics. These robots offer potential solutions to the challenges posed by a shrinking workforce and an increasing elderly population requiring long-term care. However, the high cost of these robots presents a significant barrier to access, exacerbating existing inequalities. Those with greater financial means can afford advanced robotic care, while those with limited resources are left behind, potentially facing reduced quality of life and increased strain on already overstretched social welfare systems. This disparity is further complicated by the uneven distribution of global wealth. The benefits of globalization, such as access to advanced technologies, are not evenly shared. Countries with strong economies and robust healthcare systems are better positioned to invest in and implement care robotics, further widening the gap between developed and developing nations. This creates a global care divide, where the elderly in wealthier nations enjoy the benefits of technological advancements, while their counterparts in less developed countries continue to rely on traditional, often inadequate, methods of care. Furthermore, the ethical considerations surrounding the implementation of care robotics are significant. Issues of data privacy, job displacement, and the potential for dehumanization of care must be carefully addressed. A balanced approach, prioritizing human interaction alongside technological advancements, is crucial to ensure the ethical and equitable integration of care robots into society. The future of elderly care hinges on addressing these challenges, finding ways to bridge the gap between technology's potential and the realities of social and economic inequality.
1. According to the passage, what is a major challenge in utilizing care robots to address the needs of an aging population?
2. Which of the following statements best summarizes the author's perspective on the relationship between globalization, wealth inequality, and care robotics?
3. The passage mentions ethical considerations regarding care robotics. Which of the following is NOT explicitly mentioned as an ethical concern?
4. What is the main point the author is trying to convey in the final paragraph?