The pursuit of happiness is a universal human goal, yet its definition and attainment remain elusive. In an increasingly information-saturated and technologically advanced society, we are bombarded with messages promising happiness through consumerism, social media validation, and various forms of self-improvement. However, the impact of these pursuits on genuine well-being is often questionable. One area where technology significantly intersects with our understanding of happiness is through advancements in genetic engineering, specifically genome editing. The prospect of manipulating genes to enhance physical and cognitive traits raises profound ethical and societal questions. Could we engineer "happiness" into our DNA? The answer is far from simple. While eliminating genetic predispositions to mental illness might contribute to improved well-being, the implications of selecting desirable traits extend far beyond the individual. Consider the societal ramifications of widespread access to gene editing for enhancement purposes. Would this exacerbate existing inequalities? Could it lead to a genetic arms race, where parents feel pressured to enhance their children's capabilities, thus creating new forms of social stratification based on genetic makeup? The potential for creating a society deeply divided along genetic lines poses a serious challenge to the equitable distribution of happiness and opportunity. Furthermore, the information age presents its own unique obstacles to happiness. The constant connectivity afforded by smartphones and the internet, while offering numerous benefits, also contributes to feelings of anxiety, social comparison, and FOMO (fear of missing out). The curated perfection often portrayed on social media platforms contrasts sharply with the messy reality of everyday life, leading to feelings of inadequacy and dissatisfaction. This creates a paradox: technology designed to connect us often isolates us and undermines our sense of contentment. Therefore, navigating the complex interplay between technological advancement, genetic engineering, and our pursuit of happiness necessitates careful consideration of ethical boundaries, equitable access, and a critical examination of the narratives promoted by both technology and society. It is crucial to foster a culture that values well-being beyond superficial markers of success and embraces a holistic understanding of happiness that transcends the limitations of genetic manipulation and the distractions of the digital age.
1. According to the passage, what is a major concern regarding the use of genome editing for human enhancement?
2. What is the passage's main argument concerning the relationship between technology and happiness?
3. What is the author's proposed solution to the challenges posed by genome editing and the information age in relation to happiness?
4. The passage uses the acronym "FOMO" to refer to: