The devastating earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan in 2011 highlighted the critical need for advanced warning systems and effective disaster response. Japan's Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) system, while successful in providing precious seconds of warning, underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing technological advancements with preparedness and societal adaptation. Simultaneously, the field of genome editing, particularly CRISPR-Cas9 technology, has revolutionized biological research and medicine. This technology offers unprecedented potential to cure genetic diseases, improve crop yields, and even combat infectious diseases. However, ethical concerns regarding unintended consequences and equitable access to this technology remain significant hurdles. Both EEW systems and genome editing illustrate complex problem-solving scenarios. Effective implementation requires not only scientific breakthroughs but also careful consideration of social, economic, and ethical implications. The development and deployment of EEW, for instance, necessitate robust infrastructure, public education campaigns to foster preparedness, and a responsive emergency management system. Similarly, responsible development of genome editing technologies demands rigorous ethical guidelines, transparent regulatory frameworks, and widespread public discourse to address societal anxieties. The ability to effectively address these multifaceted challenges necessitates a multifaceted approach. It requires individuals with strong problem-solving skills, encompassing critical thinking, creative solutions, collaboration, and adaptability to unforeseen circumstances. These skills are not confined to scientific fields; they are transferable and crucial for navigating the complexities of modern life. A deeper understanding of the intertwined scientific, social, and ethical dimensions of technological advancements, combined with the ability to synthesize information and propose innovative solutions, is essential for creating a more resilient and sustainable future.
1. According to the passage, what is a major challenge related to the Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) system?
2. What ethical concern is mentioned regarding genome editing technologies?
3. What skill set is described as crucial for navigating the complexities of modern life and addressing challenges like EEW and genome editing?
4. The passage suggests that the responsible development of genome editing requires:
5. What is the main idea of the passage?