ENGLISH MEBY

写真技術、認知心理学、そして不法投棄:環境問題への新たなアプローチ」の英語長文問題

以下の英文を読み、設問に答えなさい。

The proliferation of illegal dumping presents a significant environmental challenge. While stricter laws and increased penalties are often proposed as solutions, addressing the root causes of this behavior requires a deeper understanding of human psychology. This essay explores the intersection of photographic technology, cognitive psychology, and illegal dumping, suggesting innovative approaches to tackling this pervasive problem. Recent advancements in photographic technology, specifically the widespread use of high-resolution cameras and drones equipped with sophisticated imaging capabilities, have dramatically altered our ability to monitor and document illegal dumping sites. Previously, locating and identifying offenders relied heavily on eyewitness accounts and limited ground surveillance, often proving insufficient. Now, however, aerial photography and strategically placed cameras can provide irrefutable evidence, leading to increased prosecution rates. The sheer visual impact of these high-quality images, showing the extent of the environmental damage and the careless disregard for the community, can be profoundly persuasive. Cognitive psychology offers further insights into the motivations behind illegal dumping. The "bystander effect," for instance, suggests that individuals are less likely to intervene when others are present, believing someone else will take responsibility. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in cases where illegal dumping is carried out in public spaces where several individuals may witness the act. Additionally, research into cognitive biases reveals that people often underestimate the negative impact of their actions, rationalizing that their single contribution is insignificant compared to the overall problem. This "drop in the bucket" mentality justifies environmentally damaging behaviors. Combining these insights, we can develop more effective strategies for combating illegal dumping. Targeted campaigns incorporating powerful photographic evidence can directly challenge the "bystander effect" and the "drop in the bucket" mentality. High-resolution images illustrating the cumulative effect of individual actions—depicting not just a single discarded item, but the broader consequences for the ecosystem—can trigger feelings of guilt and responsibility, leading to changed behavior. Furthermore, incorporating interactive elements, such as online platforms where individuals can report illegal dumping incidents with photographic evidence, can empower communities to take proactive steps in protecting their environment. Ultimately, addressing the complex problem of illegal dumping requires a multi-faceted approach. By harnessing the power of advanced photographic technology and applying insights from cognitive psychology, we can develop innovative strategies that not only deter illegal activities but also foster a greater sense of environmental responsibility within communities.

1. According to the passage, what is one significant benefit of using high-resolution cameras and drones in combating illegal dumping?

2. The "bystander effect" in cognitive psychology is relevant to illegal dumping because:

3. What is the "drop in the bucket" mentality, and how does it relate to illegal dumping?

4. What is the passage's main argument regarding the solution to illegal dumping?