The year is 2077. A groundbreaking discovery has been made: a measurable energy signature emanating from individuals immediately following their declared time of death. This phenomenon, dubbed "residual consciousness," is not consistent across individuals; some exhibit strong signatures, while others show almost none. Initial research, conducted primarily by a coalition of European and East Asian scientists, suggests a correlation between the strength of the signature and the individual's lifetime commitment to altruistic endeavors, particularly those involving international cooperation. The discovery has sent shockwaves through the global community. Religious interpretations abound, with some sects claiming it as proof of an afterlife, while others dismiss it as a mere biological anomaly. However, the implications extend far beyond theological debates. The United Nations, already grappling with issues of global inequality and environmental collapse, is now facing a new challenge: how to utilize this discovery for the benefit of humanity. Several proposals are under consideration. One faction, led by a prominent neuroscientist from Brazil, suggests harnessing residual consciousness for advanced AI development, believing that the collective wisdom of deceased individuals could contribute significantly to solving global crises. Another group, primarily composed of ethicists and philosophers, is cautioning against such an approach, emphasizing the potential for misuse and the ethical implications of exploiting post-mortem consciousness. A third, surprisingly influential, group—comprising representatives from various NGOs and grassroots movements focused on sustainable development—advocates for the establishment of a global database of residual consciousness signatures. Their argument centers on the idea that studying these signatures could reveal patterns that would deepen our understanding of human behavior and cooperation, ultimately leading to more effective international policies and programs. The UN General Assembly is currently embroiled in heated debate. The conflict is not simply between nations with differing ideological perspectives, but also between those who prioritize technological advancement and those who prioritize ethical considerations. The future of this unique discovery, and perhaps humanity's understanding of life and death itself, hangs in the balance.
1. What is the central theme of this passage?
2. Which group advocates for creating a database of residual consciousness signatures?
3. What is the main conflict depicted in the UN General Assembly?
4. According to the passage, what factor correlates with the strength of the 'residual consciousness' signature?
5. What can be inferred about the overall tone of the passage?