The year is 2077. Presidential elections in the United States are underway, and the candidates are unlike any seen before. Candidate A, promoted by the 'New Dawn' party, is openly genetically modified. His campaign slogan is 'Enhanced for You'. His supporters point to his superior cognitive abilities, enhanced immunity, and tireless work ethic – all products of genetic engineering. He promises a technologically advanced and efficient government. However, his opponents, notably Candidate B from the 'Humanity First' party, raise serious concerns. Candidate B argues that Candidate A’s genetic modifications fundamentally alter his self-awareness and moral compass, potentially creating an unpredictable and potentially dangerous leader. B's campaign highlights the ethical implications of a genetically engineered president, questioning whether such a leader truly represents the will of the people, and whether such genetic enhancements inevitably lead to social inequality and discrimination against the 'genetically unmodified' majority. The debate extends beyond mere political rhetoric. Leading neuroscientists are divided on the issue. Some argue that genetic modification, particularly in the areas of cognitive function, can affect personality and decision-making processes in unpredictable ways. They contend that even with the best intentions, the potential for unintended side effects is immense. Others maintain that such advancements should be celebrated as a step forward for humanity, offering the opportunity to improve human capabilities and societal progress. The ethical implications are not limited to the individual candidate; the very nature of the presidency and the democratic process are called into question. Could a genetically modified president be truly accountable to the electorate? Does the concept of self-determination even apply in the same way? The 2077 election forces the nation to confront fundamental questions about identity, leadership, and the future of humanity itself.
1. What is the central conflict presented in the passage?
2. Candidate B's main argument against Candidate A centers on:
3. The passage suggests that the debate over Candidate A's genetic modification highlights:
4. What is the primary purpose of the neuroscientists' differing opinions presented in the passage?