The serene mountain village of Aomori, once famed for its pristine air and breathtaking landscapes, now faces a complex dilemma. A proposed new industrial park, promising economic revitalization, threatens to disrupt this delicate balance. The park, designed to attract high-tech industries, will inevitably lead to increased emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), a major air pollutant. This poses a significant challenge, forcing the community to confront a difficult ethical question: economic progress versus environmental preservation. The proponents of the industrial park argue that the economic benefits are undeniable. New jobs will be created, boosting the local economy and attracting young people back to the village, reversing the current trend of depopulation. Increased tax revenue will allow for improvements in infrastructure and public services, enhancing the quality of life for all residents. They contend that advanced emission control technologies can mitigate the negative environmental impact, minimizing the increase in NOx levels. However, opponents raise serious concerns. They argue that even with advanced technologies, some level of NOx pollution is inevitable, potentially harming the health of residents and damaging the delicate ecosystem. The long-term ecological consequences, they claim, are not fully understood and could outweigh any short-term economic gains. Moreover, they emphasize the intrinsic value of the village's pristine environment, arguing that economic development should not come at the expense of irreplaceable natural beauty and clean air. This group advocates for exploring alternative, more sustainable development paths that prioritize environmental protection. The village council is now tasked with resolving this conflict, weighing the competing interests of economic growth and environmental sustainability. This requires not only a detailed assessment of the potential environmental impact but also a careful consideration of the ethical dimensions of the issue. The decision they make will set a precedent, shaping the future of Aomori and serving as a case study for other communities facing similar challenges in balancing development and conservation.
1. Which of the following best summarizes the central conflict in Aomori?
2. Opponents of the industrial park primarily base their arguments on:
3. What ethical dilemma is presented in the passage?
4. The author's tone in the passage can best be described as: