The rapid advancement of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in an era of unprecedented technological progress, promising increased efficiency and economic growth. However, this progress is not without its challenges. Consider the case of a hypothetical nation grappling with the triple threat of a widening social safety net, the increasing prevalence of robot-related accidents, and a surge in resource nationalism. The nation's social welfare system, already strained by an aging population and declining birthrate, faces mounting pressure. The rising cost of providing social security, including welfare benefits for those unable to work, places a significant burden on the national budget. Simultaneously, incidents involving malfunctioning robots—ranging from minor workplace mishaps to catastrophic failures leading to injury or death—are steadily increasing, leading to rising insurance premiums and compensation claims. These claims further strain the social safety net, creating a vicious cycle of increasing costs and dwindling resources. Adding to this complexity is the rise of resource nationalism. Driven by a desire for greater self-reliance and economic security, the nation is increasingly prioritizing domestic resource acquisition. This focus, while aiming to enhance national resilience, has unintended consequences. The increased restrictions on resource exports disrupt global supply chains, affecting robot manufacturing and hindering the nation's capacity for technological advancement and economic growth. The price of essential components used in robots and other technologies skyrockets, further impacting businesses and individuals, potentially exacerbating social inequalities. The economic instability may also lead to a further decrease in tax revenue, threatening the viability of the social welfare system even more. The government is faced with a daunting dilemma. Increasing taxes to fund the social safety net and invest in improved robot safety regulations could stifle economic growth and worsen the already strained resources. However, failing to address these issues could lead to social unrest and widespread economic hardship. Balancing the need for technological progress, social welfare, and resource security presents a complex and multifaceted challenge that demands innovative and carefully considered solutions.
1. According to the passage, what is the primary reason for the increasing strain on the nation's social safety net?
2. How does resource nationalism negatively impact the nation's technological advancement?
3. What is the central dilemma facing the nation's government, as described in the passage?
4. The passage suggests a "vicious cycle" related to the social safety net. Which of the following best describes this cycle?