The 21st century presents a complex interplay of societal challenges, demanding innovative solutions and critical thinking. Consider three seemingly disparate issues: workplace power harassment (パワハラ), personalized medicine (個別化医療), and the sustainability of pension systems (年金制度). While distinct, these areas share underlying threads of inequality, resource allocation, and the ethical considerations of technological advancement. Power harassment, a pervasive problem in many workplaces, involves the abuse of authority to inflict psychological or physical harm on subordinates. Its insidious nature often makes it difficult to identify and address effectively. The consequences can range from decreased productivity and employee turnover to serious mental health issues. Combating this requires a multi-pronged approach, including stricter regulations, improved reporting mechanisms, and a significant shift in workplace culture towards respect and empathy. Personalized medicine, driven by advances in genomics and biotechnology, promises a paradigm shift in healthcare. By tailoring treatment to individual genetic profiles, it aims to improve efficacy and reduce side effects. However, this approach raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Access to these advanced technologies is likely to be unequal, potentially exacerbating existing health disparities. Furthermore, the collection and use of genetic data raises privacy and security issues that demand careful regulation. Finally, the sustainability of pension systems, a cornerstone of social welfare in many developed nations, is under increasing strain. Aging populations and declining birth rates are placing immense pressure on these systems, forcing governments to consider difficult choices. These include raising the retirement age, increasing contributions, or modifying benefit structures. Balancing the needs of current retirees with the financial viability of future generations requires a delicate balancing act, necessitating innovative solutions and potentially difficult political compromises. The interconnectedness of these three seemingly disparate issues lies in their common demand for equitable resource allocation and the ethical management of technological advancement. Addressing power harassment requires cultural change and robust regulatory frameworks. The realization of personalized medicine's potential demands careful ethical consideration and equitable access. Securing the future of pension systems requires careful financial planning and intergenerational equity. The challenge lies in forging sustainable, inclusive solutions that prioritize the well-being of all members of society.
1. According to the passage, what is a common thread connecting power harassment, personalized medicine, and pension systems?
2. What is a significant ethical concern regarding personalized medicine mentioned in the passage?
3. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a potential solution to the challenges facing pension systems?
4. The author's tone in this passage can best be described as: