ENGLISH MEBY

少子高齢化社会におけるバイオマス発電の費用対効果」の英語長文問題

以下の英文を読み、設問に答えなさい。

Japan faces a rapidly aging population and a declining birthrate, a demographic shift known as "shukōkōreika." This demographic trend presents significant challenges, including a shrinking workforce, increased strain on social security systems, and a potential energy crisis. One proposed solution to mitigate some of these challenges is increased investment in biomass power generation. Biomass, organic matter such as wood, crops, and waste, is a renewable energy source. Converting this material into energy offers a potentially sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the economic viability of biomass power generation in Japan requires careful consideration. The high cost of land, particularly in densely populated areas, is a major obstacle. The transportation of biomass, often from rural areas to urban power plants, adds further expense. Furthermore, the efficiency of biomass conversion technologies varies significantly, impacting the overall cost-effectiveness. Existing infrastructure is largely designed for fossil fuels, meaning significant upfront investment is required to adapt to a widespread adoption of biomass energy. The price fluctuation of biomass feedstock, dependent on factors such as weather and agricultural cycles, also contributes to uncertainty in cost projections. While proponents argue that biomass energy offers environmental benefits by reducing reliance on fossil fuels and potentially creating jobs in rural communities, its long-term economic sustainability remains questionable. The net economic effect will depend heavily on several factors, including government subsidies and the development of more efficient and cost-effective biomass conversion technologies. A comprehensive cost-benefit analysis is essential to determine whether this renewable energy source can truly contribute to the long-term economic security of Japan in the context of its demographic challenges.

1. According to the passage, what is a major challenge to the widespread adoption of biomass power generation in Japan?

2. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a factor affecting the cost-effectiveness of biomass power generation?

3. What is the author's overall perspective on the economic viability of biomass power generation in Japan in addressing shukōkōreika?

4. The passage suggests that a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis is crucial because: