The dazzling screens of our smartphones and electric vehicles rely on a complex web of global supply chains. At the heart of this network lies cobalt, a critical mineral essential for lithium-ion batteries. However, much of the world’s cobalt is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where its extraction is inextricably linked to human rights abuses. The mining process often involves artisanal miners, many of whom are children, working in hazardous conditions with minimal safety equipment. They toil in deep, unstable tunnels, exposed to toxic dust and collapsing shafts. The lack of regulation and oversight allows for exploitation, with miners receiving meager wages and lacking access to basic healthcare and education. This grim reality casts a long shadow over the seemingly effortless technological advancements we enjoy. The design process for electronic devices rarely incorporates a comprehensive assessment of the social and environmental impact of sourcing materials. Companies often prioritize cost-effectiveness and efficiency over ethical considerations, leading to a disconnect between the sleek design and the brutal realities of cobalt mining. This ethical lapse extends beyond the immediate producers; it involves the entire supply chain, from component manufacturers to the final assemblers and retailers. The demand for these devices, fueled by consumer culture, perpetuates this cycle of exploitation. Growing awareness of these issues is leading to initiatives promoting responsible sourcing and ethical production. Some companies are investing in improved mining practices, working to enhance worker safety and increase transparency within their supply chains. However, these efforts remain insufficient, and meaningful change requires a systemic approach that involves collaboration between governments, businesses, and civil society organizations. Ultimately, the design process itself needs to be fundamentally re-evaluated to prioritize human rights and environmental sustainability over profit maximization.
1. According to the passage, what is the primary concern regarding cobalt mining in the DRC?
2. What is the author's critique of the design process for electronic devices?
3. What solution does the passage suggest to address the problems associated with cobalt mining?
4. The phrase "ethical lapse" in paragraph 3 refers to:
5. What is the overall tone of the passage?